Hold-up and the evolution of investment and bargaining norms

نویسندگان

  • Herbert Dawid
  • W. Bentley MacLeod
چکیده

The purpose of this paper is to explore the evolution of bargaining norms in a simple team production problem with two sided relationship specific investments and competition. The puzzle we wish to address is why efficient bargaining norms do not evolve even though there exist efficient sequential equilibria? Conditions under which stochastically stable bargaining conventions exist are characterized, and it is shown that the stochastically stable division rule is independent of the long run investment strategy. Hence, efficient sequential equilibria are not in general stochastically stable, a result that may help us understand why institutions, such as firms, may be needed to ensure efficient exchange in the context of relationship specific investments. We also find that increasing competition, while enhancing incentives, may also destabilize existing bargaining norms, and may explain why the introduction of market in transition economics may initially result in reduced output. JEL Classification: C78, D83, Z13

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Does Evolution Solve the Hold-Up Problem?

The paper examines the theoretical foundations of the hold–up problem. At a first stage, one agent decides on the level of a relationship– specific investment. There is no contract, so at a second stage the agent must bargain with a trading partner over the surplus that the investment has generated. We show that the conventional underinvestment result hinges crucially both on the assumed bargai...

متن کامل

Is There a Hold–up Problem?

Most literature on the hold–up problem assumes that ex post bargaining outcomes are insensitive to prior investment costs. However, many bargaining procedures admit multiple equilibria and hence allow investment costs to affect bargaining outcomes. On the other hand, multiplicity of equilibria leaves scope for coordination failure. We report on three experiments in which unilateral investment i...

متن کامل

Unobservable Investment and the Hold-Up Problem†

We study a two person bargaining problem in which the buyer may invest and increase his valuation of the object before bargaining. We show that if all offers are made by the seller and the time between offers is small, then the buyer invests efficiently and the seller extracts all of the surplus. Hence, bargaining with frequently repeated offers remedies the hold-up problem even when the agent ...

متن کامل

Bargaining under Asymmetric Information and the Hold-up Problem

The hold-up problem is considered a fundamental determinant of contractual and organizational structure. We study a model in which players first make relation-specific investments and then bargain over the price to exchange a good. We present a new form of misallocation of resources that may arise if one of the sides has private information in the bargaining phase. In general, the outcome of ba...

متن کامل

Efficient Non-Contractible Investments in a Finite Economy*

Investors making complementary investments typically do not have in­ centives to invest efficiently when they cannot contract with each other prior to their decisions because of the hold-up problem: when they bargain over the surplus generated by their investments, they will usually not obtain the full fruits of the investment. Intuitively, the hold-up problem should be ameliorated if, in the b...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Games and Economic Behavior

دوره 62  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008